SPORTS LETTER : Ageism and arrogance

Llewellyn Edwards
Thursday 11 May 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr L Edwards

Sir: Apropos Steve Bale's article, Mutual mistrust that only money may cure (9 May), the apology tendered by Will Carling to every member of the committee tells us more about the weaknesses in Carling's leadership qualities then it does about the alleged "old farts" he so publicly and unfairly maligned. It is not the word "fart" to which I object, but rather the word "old" since it signals an obvious contempt held by Carling to do with anything aged.

In a word, Carling is guilty of ageism and, as one of some 12 million senior citizens in this country, I personally feel outraged that his glib comments reflect the disrespect in which he holds advancing years. One indeed wonders what Carling's reaction would be were his parents addressed publicly as a couple of "old farts".

While the England squad has displayed admirable loyalty to Carling, it seems quite apparent that he displays none to the RFU committee, and his sacking - though subsequently reversed - was right and proper. It matters not exactly who was involved in reaching that decision to dismiss Carling, the fact is that it was a dismissable offence from which no icon of the sporting world should be insulated. Success should not be allowed to breed a degree of arrogance to the point where the tail begins to wag the dog.

Yours,

LLEWELLYN EDWARDS,

Surbiton, Surrey

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in