Twickenham primed for lengthy investigation

Rugby Union Correspondent,Chris Hewett
Monday 18 September 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Nightmare scenarios are not exactly a novelty as far as the great and good of Twickenham are concerned - professionalism has been giving them no end of grief for more than a decade - but events at Franklin's Gardens on Saturday could cost them their sanity as well as their sleep. The Rugby Football Union is now in receipt of written complaints from two supporters who insist they heard racial abuse being aimed at a member of the Bath team, and while the West Countrymen stated yesterday that none of their players or staff heard anything of the sort, there is no easy way out of the quagmire.

Action will have to be taken because the witnesses to the alleged incident were in the stand rather than on the field. The last row of this kind, between Gloucester and Newcastle in 2001, prompted a full inquiry that stretched into 2002, but in the end there was precious little independent evidence available to the inquirers, who duly acquitted the man accused of doing the abusing, the Gloucester hooker Olivier Azam. This latest incident is more complex and potentially more serious - hence the decision of Judge Jeff Blackett, the union's chief disciplinary officer, to demand full accounts from both clubs.

It would be fatuous to suggest that rugby union is entirely free of racial abuse between players. When England played New Zealand at Twickenham in 1993, players from the home side claimed the Nigerian-born Bath prop Victor Ubogu was a target. When Samoa played South Africa in the quarter-final of the World Cup in Johannesburg two years later, the Pacific islanders' captain, Pat Lam, came close to accusing an unidentified Springbok of saying something deeply unpleasant.

But by and large, present-day union is as free from racism as any game in the world. The cast of characters at Franklin's Gardens was a thoroughly modern mix, from the fourth official David Rose - a black referee promoted to the RFU's élite panel - to the captains who were brought together and warned. Bruce Reihana of Northampton is a Maori; Isaac Fea'unati of Bath is a Samoan. As coincidence would have it, Wayne Barnes, the referee, is a barrister.

The RFU will need all the legal expertise it can get if the supporters concerned stick to their stories. One way or another, the situation is not great.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in