England vs South Africa: Anthony Watson vs Bryan Habana head-to-head
Who prevailed in the battle of the wings
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Who landed the first big blow?
Neither man landed anything of substance. Watson saw less ball in the first half than did possession-starved Semesa Rokoduguni against New Zealand a week earlier, nor did Habana exercise any undue influence.
Who was best in defence?
Neither was utterly dependable. Watson knocked on a high ball; Habana (right) was judged to have stepped into touch catching Owen Farrell’s cross-kick, and from the lineout England worked their first try.
Does Habana retain his old threat?
Not on this evidence. But the world’s fourth highest scorer of Test tries was not given the merest sniff of the line.
Watson to stay?
Like Rokodugini, he merits another go. Both will feel their brief England careers have so far passed them by.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments