All Blacks mull maul conundrum

Wednesday 29 July 2009 11:50 BST
Comments
(GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Steve Hansen isn't a fan of rugby's maul but the All Blacks forward coach is anxious his team start mastering it - preferably by this weekend.

One clear point of difference when the Springboks beat New Zealand 28-19 in Bloemfontein last weekend was the hosts' ability to chew up chunks of metres through mauling, mainly off lineouts and kick offs.

The All Blacks often transgressed in the process of stopping such drives, fuelling the penalty count against them as the test slipped out of reach in the first half.

It is a fundamental area to improve ahead of Sunday morning's (NZT) Tri-Nations test in Durban.

"It's definitely a problem if we can't stop it," Hansen said.

"South Africa are very good at what they do.

"You don't see many (New Zealand) provincial sides or franchise sides doing much of it.

"That's not the point. South Africa do and we've got to learn how to stop it and be successful at that."

However, Hansen also voiced concern about how the maul was being interpreted by referees.

He believed many allowed teams to get away with shepherding the ball carrier at the back of a drive, thereby giving the defending side no legal way of stopping it.

"The maul at the moment is something the IRB (International Rugby Board) are looking at very strongly," he said.

"It's a unique thing in that it's the only time you're allowed to have legal obstruction.

"It's something that's probably one of the difficult things in the game at the moment. You've got to have mauling in the game but it's got to be a fair contest too."

It is a busy week for Hansen, who must repair his team's spluttering lineout as well as fine-tune the maul defence and breakdown technique.

Another problem area is the kick off.

The All Blacks were often nailed deep in their own half when South Africa restarted thanks to flying winger Bryan Habana hammering the catcher before he could move.

In contrast, when New Zealand kicked off, it often went short and was gobbled up unchallenged by lock Victor Matfield.

Hansen was disappointed his pack didn't do justice to some lofted restarts.

"There was plenty of opportunity to nail Matfield too but we just didn't," he said.

"The kicks hung in the air well and long enough. We could have done more with them than we did.

"Our chase wasn't as good as the Boks' chase was."

Hansen said the sort of pressure Habana applied at kick off was "a good lesson for our blokes".

Sourced from: The New Zealand Herald

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in