Northampton Saints avoid sanction but concussion report rules George North should not have continued playing
The report made nine recommendations based on their findings
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Northampton Saints will not face any disciplinary sanctions over their handling of George North’s latest head injury but it was ruled that he should not have returned to the field of play.
North fell victim to a mid-air tackle against Premiership rivals Leicester at the start of December, landing on his neck and appearing to lose consciousness while lying motionless on the turf.
A mandatory Head Injury Assessment (HIA) was undertaken by the Saints medical staff before the Wales international was allowed to return to the field of play.
Director of rugby Jim Mallinder defended the club’s doctors over the decision before Saints released a statement admitting they did not have full access to all angles of the television footage and therefore did not see the full severity of North’s fall.
The three-man concussion review panel concluded that there was sufficient evidence to show that North should not have been allowed to return to the field of play following the incident.
North previously suffered four concussions in five months in 2014 and 2015, leading to a five-month break from the sport, and the panel stated that his medical history should have been taken into consideration when deciding whether he was fit to return.
"The Concussion Management Review Group's (CMRG) view is that there was sufficient evidence to conclude not only from the video evidence but also George North's history and risk stratification that he should not have returned to the field of play," said the report.
"The CMRG considered the welfare of North was always at the centre of Northampton's actions, and does not consider that the medical team (or the club) failed to complete the HIA protocol nor intentionally ignored the player's best interests."
The report also made nine recommendations based on the findings, including consideration of the introduction of a pitch-side video reviewer and that the entire HIA take place off the field of play, even if already started on the pitch.
Mallinder confirmed on Tuesday that North would be fit to return to competitive rugby again against Sale Sharks on Friday night after seeing a specialist to get the all-clear following a series of promising training sessions.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments