Exeter Chiefs refuse to change ‘highly respectful’ name and logo despite protests but drop ‘Big Chief’ mascot
The pressure group Exeter Chiefs 4 Change said the decision was ‘extremely disappointing’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Premiership rugby club Exeter Chiefs have decided not to change their name or logo after an internal review found their branding was ”in fact highly respectful”, although the club have stood down their mascot Big Chief “as a mark of respect”.
In a statement, the Chiefs stressed that a thorough investigation had taken into account the views of fans, players, sponsors and members of the Native American community to gauge whether their branding was offensive.
“Content provided to the board indicated that the name Chiefs dated back into the early 1900s and had a long history with people in the Devon area,” the club said.
“The board took the view that the use of the Chiefs logo was in fact highly respectful. It was noted over the years we have had players and coaches from around the world with a wide range of nationalities and cultures. At no time have any players, coaches or their families said anything but positive comments about the branding or culture that exists at the club.”
They added: “The one aspect which the board felt could be regarded as disrespectful was the club’s mascot ‘Big Chief’ and as a mark of respect have decided to retire him.”
The issue was brought to light by the group Exeter Chiefs For Change, who argued the name was outdated and should be changed, following in the path of NFL franchise Washington Redskins, now known as the Washington Football Team.
In response, Exeter Chiefs For Change said: “It’s incredibly disappointing that Exeter Chiefs has thrown away this opportunity to show itself as an inclusive club. Indigenous Peoples have made it clear time and time again that all uses of their imagery in this way are offensive, harmful and unacceptable. Exeter’s refusal to fully listen to these pleas is tone deaf and sticks two fingers up not only to them but to all minorities.
“We accept that the intention of the club for the branding was originally positive and not derogatory, but now they know it is not perceived in that way, they are making a conscious decision to be intentionally offensive by continuing to use it. The club claims that the imagery honours and respects the indigenous cultures, but if they respect them why won’t they listen to them?”
The protest group also issued a warning that the club were setting themselves up for a fall further down the line.
“As fans we are disappointed and frustrated that this battle continues. As human beings we are horrified that we still live in a society where a major sports club can treat indigenous peoples like this. It reflects badly on rugby, Devon and the UK and we should all be thoroughly ashamed.
“This decision will not age well for the club – there is no doubt that the branding will eventually have to change as it is clear depictions like that are no different from gollies and other relics of the past. By refusing to deal with it properly now the club is lining themselves up for extensive repetitional and commercial damage and bringing shame on all connected to the club in the meantime. It’s baffling that they deems this a price worth paying for selfishly and ignorantly clinging to a poorly thought-out logo that’s only been used for twenty of the club’s 150 years.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments