Dave Hadfield: Return of promotion and relegation set alarm bells ringing in Super League
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Super League clubs may look back on this week as the time when the turkeys voted for Christmas.
For anyone who missed the latest re-arrangement of the deck chairs, the clubs voted at their annual meeting to reduce the size of the top division from 14 to 12 teams for the 2015 season.
By doing so, the game is in effect rejecting the licensing system, in which it has placed such trust since 2009.
Licensing has lost all credibility because too many clubs have failed – not always through their own fault – to deliver what was required of them in return for their places at the top table.
Wakefield and Castleford, for instance, were both supposed to have moved into new stadia by now, but, following a deep recession, of that there is no convincing sign.
There was a general realisation on behalf of Super League clubs that sticking with a 14-team licensed competition was not an option. For one thing, in the absence of much talent from Australasia, there isn’t the quality in the game to sustain it. For another, it was little better than a slow death sentence for clubs which aspire to Super League, but which, under the present arrangements, have no realistic chance of getting there.
There is good rugby league played in the semi-professional Championship, but it is played, for the most part, in front of derisory crowds and amid a general feeling of pointlessness. This reform will give new hope to the likes of Featherstone, Halifax and Leigh.
Are any of them a good swap for what Super League stands to lose? That is where alarm bells start to ring. If the cull took place now, the two clubs to lose their places would be London and Salford; one of them with obvious strategic significance and the other club one of the few cashed-up operations in the division.
The other question is over the mechanics of a 12-team competition. It could revert to a 23-match regular season – home and away plus the Magic Weekend – with the top six going into the play-offs and the bottom one or two going down.
More radical would be the suggestion of two divisions of 12, splitting in mid-season to form three eights. It is vaguely reminiscent of the system in Scottish football a few years ago and, like that, runs the risk of baffling the wider public. After all, one of the reasons licensing has to go is that floating fans could not get their heads around a game without promotion and relegation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments