Rugby Union: RFU wages war on South Africa: Attacks on professionalisation of game dominate AGM

Steve Bale
Friday 08 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ENGLISH rugby launched a full-scale attack last night on the South African-led professionalisation of the amateur game that was witnessed when England were on tour in the Republic. 'Our recent visit to South Africa has revealed without any shadow of doubt that South Africa pays players, contrary to the regulations,' Denis Easby, the new Rugby Football Union president, told the RFU's annual general meeting in London.

'They are headed by a president who pays scant regard to those principles we hold dear,' Easby, a former referee from Berkshire, added. This was a reference to the South African RFU president, Louis Luyt, whose scorn for English amateur scruples so upset Easby in South Africa.

The outgoing RFU president, Ian Beer, had used the South African example to make a passionate plea against the supposed depredations of professionalism, calling on the International Rugby Board 'as a matter of urgency' to make member unions sign binding amateur agreements for 1995, Rugby World Cup year.

'To go professional is in the short term the soft option; in the long term it may be a very wrong option,' he said. 'We have a World Cup to play next year. Are the participating players to find that some are paid while others are not? The competition would become a farce.'

Meanwhile, Beer announced that the South African disciplinary committee was finally due to meet on Tuesday to consider the case of Elandre van den Berg, whose footwork in last months' Eastern Province-England game necessitated the insertion of 25 stiches into the face of Jonathan Callard. The RFU has set up its own three-man panel to look into the events of that match, which included the dismissal of England's Tim Rodber and Eastern Province's Simon Tremain.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in