Racing: Ramsden denies trainer-gambler combination `lethal' claim
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The trainer Lynda Ramsden yesterday denied there was "a conflict" between her husband's gambling success and her side of their business. Mrs Ramsden, her husband Jack and champion Flat jockey Kieran Fallon, are suing The Sporting Life for libel for saying they were cheats.
Mrs Ramsden told Mr Justice Morland and a jury at the High Court in London that often she had no idea which horse her husband, who manages the racing side while she concentrated on the horses' welfare, had a bet on.
The Ramsdens, who train at Thirsk and Fallon were the subject of a "savage onslaught" in The Life after their horse Top Cees won the 1995 Chester Cup. The Life said the couple and Fallon conspired to deceive the racing public by deliberately not trying to win the Swaffham Handicap at Newmarket three weeks earlier. Publishers MGN Ltd - part-owners of The Independent - deny libel. They say the article is true in substance and fact or fair comment on a matter of public interest.
Richard Hartley QC, cross-examining for The Life, suggested the trainer- gambler combination was "lethal", but Mrs Ramsden said all her horses were trying to win and her husband did not back them all.
Mr Hartley asked whether it was due to her husband's "betting wiles" that they had been able to build up the yard. Mrs Ramsden said the business would still have developed if he had not been a gambler. The case continues today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments