Racing: Owners split over jockeys

Tuesday 11 August 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NIGEL PAYNE, the Grand National-winning owner, last night backed the right of jockeys to carry personal sponsorship on their breeches.

But not all of Payne's fellow owners are in support as the countdown to next week's jockeys' meeting at York continues.

Leading riders, led by Jockeys' Association vice-president Richard Dunwoody, have said that they are prepared to flout current regulations and compete with sponsored logos on their riding breeches.

This is in defiance of the British Horseracing Board's insistence that racehorse owners must retain the right of veto.

Payne, a member of the Earth Summit partnership and public relations officer for Aintree racecourse said: "I am totally supportive of the jockeys' situation and would have no worries whatsoever if a jockey was riding Earth Summit and carrying advertising on his breeches and boots, whoever the sponsor or the stable's sponsor was.''

Payne, who sat alongside Jockeys' Association secretary Michael Caulfield during initial discussions upon jockeys' personal sponsorship with the BHB in 1993, said riders were requested to put their demands on hold until the question of owners' sponsorship and VAT reclamation had been resolved.

Five years down the line from this, he says he understands their grievance.

"I do feel the jockeys are owed something and entitled to it," he said. "I feel the rules have been rewritten, which is onerous on the jockeys and I believe there are certain areas they were expecting to get the go- ahead on which have been restricted.

"As long as the sponsor knows what he is buying and the jockey knows what he's selling then everyone can negotiate on that basis.

''What you don't want is the situation where you have sold something you can't give, or you've bought something you can't have," he added.

Sir Peter O'Sullevan, the former BBC racing commentator, whose colours have been carried by successful racehorses such as Attivo and Be Friendly, regretted what he saw as a confrontational stance being taken by the riders.

"Basically I support jockeys in most of their enterprises but I think possibly they have been a little bit precipitous in their demands,'' Sir Peter said.

"It wants thinking through more. It's not as simple as it has been interpreted by the riders and I think they are starting off entirely on the wrong foot by putting words into people's mouths. It wants thinking through calmly, coolly and not in a confrontational mode."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in