Racing: Levy Board refutes claims that it has been caught napping
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Claims that bookmakers are being allowed to trade without paying the levy were dismissed as inaccurate by the Levy Board yesterday. The National Association for the Protection of Punters (NAPP) claimed to have obtained evidence that punters' money was being pocketed while the Board did little to halt the practice.
By posing as a new bookmaking firm, NAPP obtained a betting permit in July last year and ignored levy demands of pounds 9,500 without incurring penalty. It alleged that under the system rogue bookmakers could keep hold of their levy payments and then go bankrupt or abscond with the funds.
However, the Levy Board chief executive, Rodney Brack, yesterday described the allegations as "mischievous, inaccurate, and ignorant of the Board's procedures". He said the Board always pursued defaulters and that there are 37 legal actions outstanding to reclaim an estimated pounds 50,000.
"It would appear to be based entirely upon the so-called evidence of one bookmaker who has never traded. The Board can, and does, pursue defaulting bookmakers."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments