Racing: Dead-heat dithering reviewed

Paul Hayward
Monday 20 July 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

RACECOURSE Technical Services yesterday blamed building works and printing difficulties for the delay in announcing the result of the first race at Newbury on Saturday. Confirmation of a dead- heat between Peto and Adam Smith came 40 minutes after the race and provoked consternation among bookmakers and punters on the busiest betting day of the week, writes Paul Hayward.

'We've had a report on the incident and it appears that the judge (Michael Hancock) required three prints of the photo-finish before it was exactly as he wanted it,' Mike Stockdale of RTS said. 'He was very, very careful to get it right.'

When a racecourse judge is unable to determine a result from the photo-finish strip a print, or enlargement, is called for and a white line transposed to correspond with the winning line. 'Normally the result wouldn't be delayed until after the next race,' Stockdale said, 'but because of the construction work at Newbury the route between the photo-finish booth and the judge's box was long and inconvenient.

'The process accumulated and the third and final print was ready just before the following race. However the operator couldn't leave his post because he had to prepare for the next event. It's not something that is expected to happen again.'

The problem with such protracted decision making is that it causes punters to delay betting until the result is known, thus depressing turnover both on and off- course.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in