Racing: Call to keep a closed shop
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MARK COTON, chairman of the National Association for the Protection of Punters, yesterday called on both bookmakers and the Home Office to consult punters before making changes to betting shops, writes Mark Popham.
Coton was reacting to Home Office plans announced the previous day to allow betting shops to serve a range of refreshment, to show racing on large screens and to have shop fronts which no longer prohibit a view of the interior.
He said: 'It would be nice for once if the bookmakers and the Home Office actually gave some thought to what the consumer thinks, instead of assuming they know what the consumer wants.
'We welcome the Home Office document on de-regulation, but they should be cautious about opening up betting- shop windows,' Coton said. 'I have spoken to punters today in betting shops about whether they would be happy betting with their activities witnessed by the outside world and the reaction was no, they wouldn't want that.
'The reason is do with the basic appeal of betting which is a secretive activity on the whole. That does not mean it is sordid, unpleasant or disreputable.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments