Usada backs US government decision to withhold Wada payment

The situation comes amid a dispute over the Wada’s handling of a doping scandal involving Chinese swimmers competing in Tokyo in 2021

Chris Wilson
Thursday 09 January 2025 12:25 GMT
Comments
Wada president Witold Banka had previously said that the agency’s “integrity and reputation” was under attack
Wada president Witold Banka had previously said that the agency’s “integrity and reputation” was under attack (AFP via Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The US Anti-Doping Agency (Usada) has stated that it “fully supports” the US government’s decision to withhold a $3.6m (£2.8m) payment to the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) in light of the organisation’s handling of a major doping scandal.

News emerged in April 2024 that 23 Chinese swimmers were cleared to compete at the Tokyo Olympics in 2021 despite having tested positive for a banned heart medication – called trimetazidine – in the preceding months.

The country’s own anti-doping agency determined that the athletes had ingested the substance unintentionally, with Wada later saying that it was “not in a position to disprove” this claim.

Usada chief executive Travis Tygart made a statement on the refusal of the payment, claiming that it was “the only right choice to protect athletes’ rights, accountability and fair competition”.

He added that Wada “left the US with no other option after failing to deliver on several very reasonable requests, such as an independent audit of [its] operations, to achieve the transparency and accountability needed”.

Wada responded to this statement by saying that US representatives will now be unable to sit on either its foundation board or executive committee.

At the time of the scandal emerging, Wada said that it had been caught up in “geopolitical tensions” between the two countries, with an independent investigation later finding that the agency had not mishandled the case, nor had it shown any bias towards Chinese swimmers.

Tygart’s statement added: “Since the exposure of Wada’s failed handling of the 23 Chinese swimmers’ positive tests that gave China and its athletes special treatment under the rules, many stakeholders from around the world - including athletes, governments and National Anti-Doping Agencies - have sought answers, transparency and accountability from Wada leadership.

“Because Wada failed to uniformly enforce the global rules in place to protect the integrity of competition and athletes’ rights to fairness, significant reform at Wada must occur to ensure this never happens again.”

The US has been the highest-funding government partner of Wada since the agency’s inception in 2000, and the country will host the next Olympics in Los Angeles in 2028.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in