Paula Radcliffe says Games money is better spent elsewhere
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Paula Radcliffe has labelled the decision to double the budget for the London 2012 opening and closing ceremonies as "frivolous" and suggested the money could have been better used elsewhere.
The Government yesterday announced that an extra £41million of public money is to be put into the ceremonies to go alongside cash from the London organising committee.
Radcliffe, 37, speaking after being selected as one of three marathon runners for Team GB for the Olympics next year, said there were better uses for the money.
She said: "I think it is a a little bit frivolous to throw a lot at it given the fact we are in a recession.
"The money could be thrown at other areas such as grass-roots sports.
"The Games are costing quite a bit as it is and it would be better off spent in ways which would give more back long term."
Radcliffe will be competing at her fifth consecutive Olympics in London next year but admitted she had yet to attend an opening ceremony for a Games.
"I've always been in team holding camps," she added.
Olympics minister Hugh Robertson described the extra funding as an investment to attract business and tourism to Britain when the eyes of the world were on London.
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments