Briton Williams helmet protest rejected

Mark Staniforth,Pa
Friday 19 February 2010 11:34 GMT
Comments
(GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Amy Williams remains on track for an Olympic gold medal after a protest lodged by the United States team over the design of her helmet was thrown out by Bobsleigh Federation officials.

The American team objected to the spoiler on the back of Williams' helmet which they claimed breached an article of the federation's rule-book which deems that a helmet has to be without any additionally attached aerodynamic elements.

But after a protest meeting the federation issued a statement which read: "The protest was denied because the helmet in question was inspected by the jury. According to the helmet manufacturer the spoilers are an integral part of the helmet."

The failed protest means Williams is free to defend her first place after the first two runs of the women's skeleton competition in Whistler on Friday night.

Williams holds a 0.30 second lead going into the last two runs of the competition.

A British Olympic Association spokesman said: "We were always entirely comfortable that we had the documentation that was needed in order to prove that the helmet complied with the regulations."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in