Britain's medal heroes come out of the blocks for London's effort

Matthew Beard
Thursday 17 February 2005 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

For such Olympic heroes as Dame Kelly Holmes, Sir Steve Redgrave and Amir Khan, the scenario must have seemed familiar as they took their places in front of a hungry media.

For such Olympic heroes as Dame Kelly Holmes, Sir Steve Redgrave and Amir Khan, the scenario must have seemed familiar as they took their places in front of a hungry media.

But on this occasion the questions were not about race tactics, injuries or knock-out punches but concerned the rather more prosaic proceedings in a hotel conference room where the evaluation of London's bid to stage the Olympic Games in 2012 got under way yesterday morning.

This was no time to be divulging too much about how the inspection team from the International Olympic Committee (IOC) had reacted to their presentations, for fear of handing rival cities an advantage. Instead, the assembled athletes told of their emotional commitment to staging the best Games ever. "During the presentation the hairs on the back of my neck were standing up and I was thinking that I wish I was 20 or 30 years younger and would be able to compete in a London Olympics," said Sir Steve Redgrave, who as bid ambassador observed the opening exchanges on the subject of Britain's sporting traditions and its venue proposals. "I think we got the message across very strongly."

In his enthusiasm he may have contravened IOC rules that ban negative comments about other bid cities when asked about the priority London gave the Paralympics - saying the event was an integral part of the presentation, unlike Madrid, which demoted that part of its programme at the IOC inspection.

The first working day of the evaluation commission had not begun well as the furore surrounding London's Mayor, Ken Livingstone, proved increasingly problematic. But they opened with their trump card, a bold statement from Lord Coe, the bid leader, on how the "golden games" would play to packed houses and be the best ever.

"I've seen many wonderful Games, seen them and taken part in them, but I am an athlete and I don't run to come second" said Lord Coe, typically incorporating his own success story in the bid pitch. "London's ambition is not just to be a good Olympic Games, it is to be the best."

The serious business of assessing a Games blueprint is a world away from the excitement and glamour of the event itself. In the sober surroundings of a ballroom-sized hotel room in Canary Wharf, the 13 IOC commissioners sat behind desks in a semi-circle opposite the bid representatives, while to one side a team of technical experts was on hand for supplementary questions.

A lunch for the IOC delegates attended by bid leaders, sporting ambassadors and the Princess Royal provided an opportunity for a softer sell.

Among the themes covered in a gruelling day of presentations were London's proposals for transport, environment and the inaugural topic of "concept and legacy" presented by Tessa Jowell, the Culture Minister, and Mr Livingstone.

The pair may be at odds over Mr Livingstone's remarks to an Evening Standard reporter but their presentation, as well as that given on sport, ended with the verdict "absolutely fantastic" from the IOC.

Much of the content of the 17 presentations that will be made during the visit are based on the 600-page "bid book" submitted late last year to the IOC. Improvements have been made and it is these that are emphasised during the pitches.

How well such innovations, including the proposal to build four collapsible venues and move them to the provinces after the Games, have gone down with the inspectors is difficult to say at this stage as the meetings were held behind closed doors.

London 2012, not wanting to hand an advantage to its arch-rival Paris which awaits the inspectors, has declined to discuss the points on which the plans were scrutinised.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in