And the winner is... Jamaica?

William Faulks
Saturday 23 August 2008 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

With a population of 1.3 billion, and on home turf, China's success at this Olympic Games is impressive but perhaps not surprising. So, in an effort to create a level playing field and for a bit of fun, an alternate medals table has been created online by Channel 4. By awarding each medal a value (three points for gold, two for silver and one for bronze) and then dividing each nation's total medal score by its population, a new world order is created.

While China may top the official medals table, they take a great leap backwards to a 64th-place finish in the population-weighted system. The US fare little better, in 41st. Jamaica, disadvantaged in the main contest by only being good at the "real" sports, take first place, ahead of Slovenia (whose proficiency with weapons through the ages pays off with a gold in the hammer throw and a silver in the men's laser) and Bahrain (who may have only won one gold medal, but have a population twice that of Aldershot).

Other rankings on the site ( www.c4news.com) include a table that factors in each nation's GDP (surprisingly led by the North Koreans), a table dependant on human rights (unsurprisingly not led by North Korea), and a table showing "US Ordering", in which competing countries are ranked by total medals won. This is the method that the US media have adopted. Currently – in fact, for a while now – that medals chart is topped by the US.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in