League wary of threat from below

Thursday 19 December 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Football League could be left in a state of utter confusion today if a "rebellion" of smaller clubs blocks restructuring plans. Chairmen of the 72 Nationwide League clubs will meet in a London hotel for an Extraordinary General Meeting where it had been expected they would ratify the new set- up.

But concern by some Second and Third Division clubs over the power to be wielded by the larger First Division outfits under the new proposals, could wreck the plans and leave the League in limbo. The proposals, tabled by Ipswich, Wolves, Oldham and Crystal Palace, will see the present six- man Board of Directors dismantled and replaced by an independently-chaired nine-man body, elected on both a regional and divisional basis.

The League president, Gordon McKeag, will immediately stand down as chairman. The new-look Board will commission an independent report considering, among various issues, the structure of the League and Board, the role of the chairman, and the possibility of appointing a Chief Executive.

The proposal needs 75 per cent approval, meaning that 19 clubs voting against would constitute a blocking minority. At least 13 clubs are understood to be prepared to vote down the proposals and one chairman predicted: "It will be a close call."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in