How other sports protect officials
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CRICKET
Violence against cricket officials is rare and there has been no incident comparable with Paolo Di Canio's attack on Paul Alcock. In 1980, the West Indian bowler Colin Croft barged into umpire Fred Goodall following a controversial decision during a Test match in New Zealand but escaped punishment after claiming it was accidental. Mike Gatting, the former England captain, merely had to apologise after his finger-jabbing confrontation with the Pakistani umpire Shakoor Rana in 1987. Jack Bannister, who represented the Cricketers' Association on the commitee that suspended Geoff Arnold for verbal abuse of an umpire in the 1970s, said: "In the present climate, a physical assault would almost certainly incur a lengthy ban, possibly up to a full season.
RUGBY UNION
Neil Back, the Leicester flanker, received a six-month suspension for shoving Steve Lander, the international referee, at the end of the 1996 cup final at Twickenham, but his assault was nowhere near as full-blooded as that perpetrated by Di Canio. Any player found guilty of striking a match official - and a Di Canio-style push would almost certainly come into the "striking" category - could expect to be suspended sine die. Rugby Football Union guidelines recommend a life ban for "extreme physical assault".
RUGBY LEAGUE
Rugby league has traditionally taken a stern view of any violence against officials. David Myers of Bradford was banned for the rest of the season after "deliberately colliding" with the referee, John Connolly, in February 1995. The Salford prop, Ian Blease, was banned sine die in May 1997 for hitting a touch-judge during a reserve team fixture at Bradford. The suspension was later reduced to end on 31 March this year, since when Blease has played for Swinton.
BOXING
The most famous case of a boxer hitting an official came in December 1987 at Wembley Arena, when a light-heavyweight, Bobby Frankham, attacked referee Richie Davies after Frankham's fight with Bobby Sim was stopped in round one. Frankham later claimed his behaviour came as a result of powerful pain-killers he had taken; apparently, he was so badly affected that he had forgotten he was to fight that evening and had started drinking in the bar before his bout. But Frankham's plea for mitigation was not well received and he was banned for life.
BASKETBALL
No basketball player has attacked a referee on court since the National League was formed in 1972 or in the Budweiser League since it began in 1987. But an incident similar to di Canio's actions at Hillsborough would "bring a substantial fine and a lengthy ban, possibly until the end of the season" according to the sport's disciplinary office Morris Wordsworth. "But, depending obviously on the severity of the assault, I doubt whether a player would be banned for life." Such is the pace, size and strength of the athletes and opportunity for violent contact in basketball that games have at least two on-court officials, and three in some competitions, plus a courtside commissioner. If dissent grows a referee can cool the situation by applying technical fouls until the player has to leave the court after collecting two or three, depending the severity of the dissent.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments