Shy prodigy who became a poised 'fighter'

Jonathan Speelman
Wednesday 14 July 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I first met Michael Adams at a tournament in London in the early 1980s when he was 11 or 12 years old. He had an adjourned game which I helped analyse and, although he eventually only drew, I formed a firm impression then of a boy so quiet, shy and apparently harmless that he was undoubtedly utterly deadly.

I first met Michael Adams at a tournament in London in the early 1980s when he was 11 or 12 years old. He had an adjourned game which I helped analyse and, although he eventually only drew, I formed a firm impression then of a boy so quiet, shy and apparently harmless that he was undoubtedly utterly deadly.

Adams quickly progressed to become one of England's top players and this was confirmed a few years later when he reached the final of a rapid-play tournament against Nigel Short, then England's number one. Short kept posing terrible problems but Adams, in his middle teens, repeatedly found defences to stay in the game.

The eminent Russian grandmaster Yuri Averbakh classifies chess players in categories such as "problem solvers", "fighters", "artists" and "players". Most players are a mixture of these - and Adams is perhaps best described as a "fighting player": not too concerned with beauty like an "artist" or with finding the best move in every position like a "problem solver".

As one of the world's great players, he has built on his natural talent with much hard work including extensive opening preparation. It brought him to the World Championship final and I'm only sorry he didn't go one step further.

Jonathan Speelman is a chess grandmaster and was British champion three times

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in