Racing: Jockeys in hot water after Exeter bungle

Anita Chambers
Saturday 03 December 2005 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

David Crosse and Tom O'Brien were banned for 10 days after taking the wrong course in the Devon Marathon Handicap at Exeter yesterday. Crosse was aboard Auburn Spirit and O'Brien was riding Limerick Leader in the four-mile event when they, along with Antony Evans on Jiver, bypassed the water jump on the second circuit. The fence had been dolled off the first time around, but it was in use for the second circuit.

The stipendiary steward Simon Cowley said: "It was dolled off in accordance with Jockey Club instructions - they are not allowed to jump the water as the first fence in a chase. The jockeys were all aware of this, it was clearly posted on the weighing room map so no-one should be in any doubt as to what they should do.

"Three horses appeared to go round it for no obvious reason so the stewards asked those jockeys to explain why they did that.

"In the case of Antony Evans, the stewards felt there was just a little bit of doubt as to whether he had taken the wrong course as misjudgement or whether he had in fact pulled up because he was always intending to. They gave him the benefit of the doubt."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in