Racing: Cards threatened by payments row

John Cobb
Wednesday 27 November 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The British Horseracing Board and representatives of national newspapers will meet next month in an attempt to resolve a dispute that threatens the future of racing coverage in the media.

The confrontation with the BHB has come about through a demand by racing's ruling body for an annual circulation-based payment for the right to carry racecards in newspapers. The proposed scale of charges would cost each national newspaper up to £340,000 a year.

Until now, newspapers have paid a nominal amount for the use of racecards, on the basis that, while the media benefited from being able to supply such information to their readers, the sport benefited more through being able to advertise its product to a wide audience. As the number of cards has increased year on year, with up to six meetings on some weekdays in summer, the cards often take up a high proportion of newspapers' sports sections compared with the level of interest in the meetings concerned.

Newspapers insist that they will not pay the new charges and an attempt last week by Peter Savill, the chairman of the BHB, to defer the issue of payment until the end of 2003 was rejected by the Newspaper Publishers' Association.

In common with other newspapers, The Independent has dropped the names of race-sponsors from its cards in protest. The only exceptions will be major races which cannot be identified easily in any other way, such as this Saturday's Hennessy Gold Cup.

The BHB's plans have met with widespread criticism within the sport. The Horserace Sponsors' Association described the demands as "extortionate" and called for the resignation of Nigel Smith, the BHB's commercial managing director.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in