Pound raps Fifa stance on drug cheats
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Dick Pound, the head of the World Anti-Doping Agency, has attacked Fifa's reluctance to sign up to a worldwide code on drugs and claimed that football may be helping cheats back into the game.
Pound reiterated a threat that if football's world governing body has not signed the Wada code by the summer there will be no football at the Athens Olympics. "It makes it sound like they are actively looking for ways to put cheaters back into play," he said.
"The ball is in Fifa's court. The IOC [International Olympic Committee] has amended the Olympic charter so that only sports which have adopted and implemented the world anti-doping code can be on the Olympic programme. If they don't sign they don't have to bother coming to Athens.
"Where is the moral outrage that here's somebody who has deliberately cheated in order to improve their performance?" he asked. "It's not like a guy was captured by Nazi frogmen and injected against his will."
Fifa and the governing body of international cycling, UCI (Union Cycliste Internationale), are reluctant to sign up to an automatic two-year ban for any athlete who uses performance-enhancers, but Pound insisted there was scope for every case to be treated on its own merits.
"There is not an automatic two-year sanction for a first offence. That could not be clearer in the code. You also have to consider the circumstances of each individual case . That has been there since the beginning," he said. "I don't know what the stumbling block is. It makes me wonder whether or not these people can read."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments