The Independent's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.
Cycling: Lance Armstrong ignores USADA deadline to cooperate
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) will push ahead with efforts to clean up cycling without help from Lance Armstrong after the disgraced cyclist rejected another deadline to meet anti-doping investigators yesterday.
Armstrong's lawyer Tim Herman said in a statement released yesterday that the former cyclist still had issues with USADA, who had exposed him as drug cheat and led to him being stripped of his seven Tour de France titles.
In a television interview with Oprah Winfrey last month, Armstrong admitted to using performance-enhancing drugs throughout his career.
Following his admission, USADA offered Armstrong an opportunity to come forward and tell what he knows about doping in cycling and provide details about how he cheated and was able to avoid detection.
The anti-doping agency had originally provided Armstrong with a deadline of Feb. 6, but on the cyclist's request extended that offer until yesterday.
"Following his (Armstrong's) recent television interview, we again invited him to come in and provide honest information, and he was informed in writing by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) that this was the appropriate avenue for him if he wanted to be part of the solution," USADA chief Travis Tygart said in a statement.
"Over the last few weeks he has led us to believe that he wanted to come in and assist USADA, but was worried of potential criminal and civil liability if he did so.
"Today we learned from the media that Mr. Armstrong is choosing not to come in and be truthful and that he will not take the opportunity to work toward righting his wrongs in sport."
Tygart said the anti-doping agencies were determined to rid the sport of doping with or without Armstrong's help.
"At this time we are moving forward with our investigation without him and we will continue to work closely with WADA and other appropriate and responsible international authorities to fulfill our promise to clean athletes to protect their right to compete on a drug free playing field," he said.
Armstrong would fully cooperate should an international tribunal be formed to address doping in professional cycling, his lawyer said.
"We remain hopeful that an international effort will be mounted, and we will do everything we can to facilitate that result," Herman said on behalf of Armstrong.
"In the meantime, for several reasons, Lance will not participate in USADA's efforts to selectively conduct American prosecutions that only demonize selected individuals while failing to address the 95 percent of the sport over which USADA has no jurisdiction."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments