Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The governing body of athletics has revealed that it will only be testing one in three athletes at the World Championships, which start in Beijing on Saturday, instead of all the participants, in spite of the ongoing furore over the sport’s drug-testing policies.
The International Association of Athletics Federations took a blood sample of every athlete at the previous two World Championships, at Daegu in 2011 and in Moscow two years ago, but in China it will only test 600 or 700 competitors as part of a new system of targeting specific elite athletes, instead of blanket-testing the entire field of around 1,900.
It revealed to the The Guardian that the “core testing” began six months ago, insisting that it was more effective to target athletes while they were in training.
The body issued a statement which said: “The most important time to be testing many of the athletes is during the off-season when the heavy training loads are taking place. That approach is no secret – but it is often easier for sports to simply pile on the tests during the event itself and claim a successful anti-doping programme. The reality is far from it. The testing in Beijing is important – but nowhere near as important as a truly non-notice out-of-competition programme conducted during the preceding six months or longer.”
The IAAF said it tested all athletes at the last two Worlds because it was establishing the information needed to produce a blood passport, which had proved a useful resource in the fight against doping.
The reduction in the scale of testing will provoke dismay in the current climate. The IAAF is still reeling from revelations in The Sunday Times that a database of 12,000 samples from 5,000 athletes, leaked from within the IAAF, showed suspicious tests – with experts claiming a third of medals in endurance events at the Olympics and Worlds, between 2001 and 2012, were won by athletes with abnormal readings in their blood passport.
The IAAF subsequently admitted that 28 athletes are facing disciplinary action after their urine samples from the 2005 and 2007 Worlds were analysed for a second time.
The president of European Athletics, Svein Arne Hansen, said: “It is clear our members feel there needs to be more proactive communication from the IAAF. They also say that if there is anything more our sport can do to get a handle on this issue, it should be done as soon as possible.
“I think we need to expand the fight and our dialogue beyond new rules and the number of doping control tests carried out.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments