Paula Radcliffe has every right to keep data private, says Jo Pavey
Jo Pavey released her blood data last month and said athletics would benefit from more ‘transparency’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Jo Pavey has said she understands Paula Radcliffe’s resistance to the publication of her blood data in response to recent drug allegations – but that her sport would benefit if more athletes opted for “transparency” to prove their innocence.
Pavey, the 41-year-old European Championship gold medallist, was among a number of British athletes who released their full data to The Sunday Times last month in the wake of a series of reports relating to their sport.
Radcliffe has so far resisted the temptation to publish her full data, saying pressure to do so is “almost abuse” – although three of her supposedly high readings have been made public by Sky News.
Pavey said that while she had no regrets about deciding to issue her own details, she felt that Radcliffe had every right to reject the opportunity to follow suit.
Pavey said: “I was very keen to release my blood data because I was keen to facilitate transparency within the sport and I didn’t see any reason why I should not do so.
“I thought it was a pro-active step towards that transparency. You don’t want all these things shrouded in secrecy and to that extent it should be encouraged.
“But I can only speak for myself. It should be a personal decision and people shouldn’t be put under pressure to do it one way or the other.”
Pavey’s belief in Radcliffe’s personal choice over the issue is echoed by the IAAF president, Lord Coe, who likened the pursuit of Radcliffe to “McCarthyesque witch hunts” and added: “I don’t think she should have been forced to do it. I absolutely believe Paula Radcliffe is clean.”
Radcliffe’s trainer and husband, Gary Lough, has now called on the World Anti-Doping Agency to confirm the reasons for Radcliffe’s higher-than-usual scores, and thus emphasise her innocence.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments