The problem with England’s greatest strength? Senegal also have it
The last-16 opponents have each demonstrated a special unity at the Qatar World Cup
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Almost every night throughout this World Cup, the England squad have gathered together in a huge TV room, to watch the games and discuss what they see. They don’t sit in cliques but rather as one big group, Jack Grealish often bouncing around between people. It has struck staff how so few ever spend time sitting in their rooms on the PlayStations and instead spend time together.
Brazil have most stood out for the players, and the general feeling is that if England are to actually win this World Cup then they will have to defeat Tite’s side. The squad had taken note of Senegal even before it was confirmed they would meet in the last 16, and their quality has been noted. England are expecting a robust challenge.
“We’ve all been watching every game so we have a slight understanding between us players of what they’re like, and I think they’ll be very athletic,” Jordan Henderson says. “Good players as well, and I think they’re quite high on confidence as a team, as they won the Africa Cup of Nations. They are used to winning.”
Through that, Henderson and many of his senior teammates have perceived something different in Senegal. It is something they recognise because England have it, too.
It isn’t anything tactical or to do with quality, although it is actually as important to winning a tournament as both of those qualities. It isn’t really momentum, either. It’s deeper than that.
It’s a unique unity that carries a team through, that ensures setbacks don’t sap the group and doubt doesn’t seep in.
“I’d say the togetherness of this group is the closest it’s been,” Henderson says. “I thought Russia was close at the time but we’ve been through things together. In Russia, [gone] through the Euros, and experiences like that do make you stronger. I feel we’re in a really good place together at the moment, a really good team spirit, the work ethic and intensity in training, pushing each other on.”
That is also something that Gareth Southgate has intentionally fostered and arguably doesn’t get enough credit for. If the criticisms that he is too tactically rigid or unimaginative are fair, there is an argument those flaws are offset by the mentality and atmosphere he creates within the group. The same is said of Didier Deschamps by French players.
He is going to need all of that now because this is going to be a distinctive test. It may even be England’s hardest challenge, in particular ways. This is not to say that Southgate’s side will go on and win the World Cup or are comparable to Spain 2010, but it does pose a similar sort of test to that which the eventual champions faced in Paraguay in the quarter-finals 12 years ago. Vicente del Bosque’s players faced more talented teams but they all still talk about that match as the most gruelling of their entire World Cup.
Senegal may well be similar. With Kalidou Koulibaly leading a strong backline, and a robust three-man midfield in front of them, Aliou Cisse’s side are going to be exceptionally difficult to break down.
Those who believe Southgate has mostly gotten lucky as a manager with forgiving runs may well point to Sadio Mane’s injury and the suspension of Idrissa Gueye as another stroke of fortune, in the same way that James Rodriguez was injured for Colombia at this exact stage of the World Cup four years ago. There is no argument it removes Senegal’s cutting edge. It also seems likely that Cisse will be absent on the day through illness.
At the same time, the very spirit that the manager has fostered means such setbacks serve as rallying calls. They deepen the spirit. That’s the element that Henderson recognised. The issues may also focus the tactical approach, as it means Senegal have to play a very specific way. The problems they have encountered have created a counterintuitive clarity, one that was distilled in Koulibaly’s smooth strike to win the match against Ecuador and put them into the last 16.
Against that, Southgate also faces a tactical test. The game isn’t so clear for him. What he must do isn’t so obvious, except when it comes to the make-up of the midfield.
The fact Senegal play with three, in that shape, means Southgate has little option but to play three of his own in Declan Rice, Jude Bellingham and Henderson. To do anything else would be brave, or risky, especially given the danger of Ismaila Sarr getting down the left.
It will have the effect of removing a place for one of England’s many attacking options, and that in a game where Southgate is likely to need both patience and intricacy. Who he starts with will be more important than any game so far but, as the group stage has shown, not crucial.
This is the great benefit of so many options, and why it is probably wrong to just view a starting XI as the fixed thing it used to be. Football has changed, with five substitutes only furthering this. Rugby coach Eddie Jones has been mentioned a lot around the England camp this week, but his especially his description of “finishers”.
Those who don’t start are no longer seen as “substitutes”. They’re players that can come in to change the dynamic. It is another distinctive advantage England have in this tournament, that the players believe is only matched by Brazil, and maybe France.
If Marcus Rashford or Phil Foden don’t open you with pace and ingenuity, Jack Grealish and Bukayo Saka can get at with you pure dribbling and directness.
Some of this has also served Southgate’s attempts to foster a spirit. It means that everyone feels involved, everyone knows they have a chance of making an impact.
“The people that don’t particularly play as much [but] train every day, I have always felt they are really important in tournament football – always, even more so now with the five subs,” Henderson says. “It enhances that a bit more. It’s always important to support the lads that are playing but also support the lads who aren’t playing, who are working every day, come in to training pushing the lads who are playing. Maybe not playing as much as they’d like, it can be really difficult at times. It is important we support each other and we have done really, really well, not just this tournament but the last one as well.
“No matter what stage the game is at, you always need your subs to come on and perform straight away at the highest level.”
The basic truth of this game is that England must go to another level. This is where the World Cup gets serious, where any slip is fatal. There is nothing like it in sport, because there’s nothing like the World Cup. All of that joy and momentum can be undone in an instant. Going for everything can leave you with nothing.
It is why that unique unity is so important. The problem for England is that Senegal have it, too.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments