Chelsea aim to sign Fernando Llorente Wednesday but relying on Manchester City to do business with Swansea first
The Blues are still £3m short of Swansea's valuation for Llorente
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Chelsea are aiming to conclude a deal for Fernando Llorente on Wednesday, although there is still a distance between them and Swansea City in terms of price, and any purchase is still dependent on Wilfried Bony's return to the Liberty Stadium from Manchester City.
The defending Premier League champions have had an initial bid of around £12m for the Spanish international rejected, with Swansea holding out for over £15m, although that already represents a shift in position and a move is now seen by those close to the player as "almost inevitable".
Once a fee is agreed, Swansea will move in for Bony for the same price.
Manager Antonio Conte has been keen to offer another back-up to Alvaro Morata up front, and Llorente offers an ideal alternative. He has worked with both Conte and Morata in the past, at Juventus, and is seen as something of a mentor to the younger Spanish striker.
Chelsea meanwhile retain an interest in Everton's Ross Barkley and are likely to make a move over the final 36 hours of the window, although that could be dependent on Diego Costa going in the other direction.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments