Premier League content with current policing costs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Premier League has rejected calls for clubs to meet the full cost of policing matches.
According to an investigation by BBC Radio Five Live, which included evidence from 13 of the 20 top-flight teams, it cost more than £7.5m to police their games last season – with £4.35m coming from the clubs and the £3.2m shortfall picked up by local forces.
Under current arrangements, clubs have a minimum legal requirement to pay for any costs incurred inside their stadiums or property – but the Association of Chief Police Officers has demanded they also fund match-related security away from grounds.
The ACPO's Stephen Thomas, an assistant chief constable in the British Transport Police, earlier insisted clubs' financial liability should be total.
But the Premier League's chief spokesman, Dan Johnson, said clubs should expect those costs to be met through tax contributions.
"The law is quite clear – clubs pay for any policing inside the ground and on immediately adjacent property under their control on matchday," he said. "Any other provision deemed necessary is covered by the state – it's what people pay their taxes for, with the Premier League alone contributing more that £700m a year to the Treasury, let alone the tax take from the 13m fans who attend Premier League games during the course of a season.
"This long-established principle applies to all individuals and organisations in the UK, from private individuals to shopping centres, pubs and major events, like the Notting Hill Carnival. Our clubs have invested heavily in all-seater stadia, CCTV and stewarding – as a result the numbers of police required to ensure public safety, and therefore the cost, has reduced over the past 15 years.
"We are always happy to discuss how it might be possible to further reduce costs, or how football can help the police tackle youth crime, but we fail to see why football fans should pay twice for policing."
Elsewhere, Manchester City's executive chairman Garry Cook moved to ease fears for the future after owner Thaksin Shinawatra skipped bail in Thailand.
"City's future is not in jeopardy," Cook said. "In the short term it is business as usual. We don't rely on Dr Thaksin's money. When Mark Hughes makes a decision we go through the normal process, which can include banks, finance or a whole bunch of different things like any other club."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments