Norwich defend decision to furlough non-playing staff
Club have explained their refusal to u-turn on using the government scheme, with losses expected of up to £35m
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Norwich City have defended their decision to place some of their non-playing staff on furlough leave during the coronavirus pandemic.
The Canaries are one of only two Premier League clubs using the scheme, where employees receive 80 per cent of wages from the Government up to £2,500 although, in this instance, the club is making up the remaining 20 per cent.
Newcastle are the other top-flight club to turn to the job retention programme while Liverpool, Tottenham and Bournemouth made u-turns on their decisions to furlough staff following heavy criticism.
But Norwich chief operating officer Ben Kensell told BBC Radio Norfolk: “The decision we made was in the best interests of the club and its staff.
“We’ve been very transparent that we’re run in a self-financed manner. Ultimately, if we had the available cashflow to not have to take up schemes then, like other football clubs have, we would.
“The difference is we’re running it as a business and we’re running it the best way we believe will help it for the future. It’s also about our staff. What we don’t want is a raft of redundancies.
“We knew we’d get criticised as a result of it; what we’re not going to do is take a different view on that. We’ll stick to our guns and we believe we are doing it for the right reasons.
“We’ve got the best owners in football – that’s a fact. We haven’t got the richest owners but we like to think we’re doing things the right way.”
Norwich, who are bottom of the table with nine games remaining, are reportedly budgeting for a loss of between £18million and £35m due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Norwich sporting director Stuart Webber told The Pink Un: “As we sit here today we don’t know when we’re going to play football again, we don’t know when the season is going to end, if there’s going to be fans or not be fans.
“So it’s very, very difficult to say that we are definitely going to lose this, which means we need to reclaim X amount. Until that time comes and we get more clarity, we won’t be talking to any of our players or staff about deferrals or cuts.”
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments