How do Manchester United solve their Paul Pogba problem?
Pogba has played poorly at the start of this season but Ole Gunnar Solskjaer’s use of the midfielder deserves scrutiny too
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It would be an understatement to say that Paul Pogba - Manchester United’s record signing and most naturally gifted player - has not made the best of starts to the new season but his performance in Sunday’s narrow defeat to Arsenal was the lowest point yet.
Pogba’s foul on Hector Bellerin to concede Arsenal’s second-half penalty was not as slapstick as the one on Ben Davies in the 6-1 defeat to Tottenham. It did not earn as much commentary box opprobrium as his handball in the 1-1 draw with West Ham during Project Restart.
And yet, the fact that this was the third instance of Pogba conceding a spot-kick at Old Trafford in the space of less than four months is more than a little concerning.
Pogba rarely performs post-match media duties - and only usually when he has something pointed to say - but fronted up after the final whistle to apologise for his error.
“Maybe I was a bit out of breath and it made me do this stupid mistake,” he said. “I shouldn't have given a penalty away like that. I'm not the best defensively in the box but I can learn and work on that.”
These ‘stupid mistakes’ would be more easily forgiven if Pogba’s all-round performances were close to living up to the extraordinarily high standards which are expected of him.
Instead, his erratic individual displays have been a symbol of United’s collective inconsistency.
Pogba’s best performances during the opening weeks of the new season have largely come as a substitute, whether that be away at Brighton in the EFL Cup, his influential work in the Champions League victory over Paris Saint-Germain or during last weekend’s goalless draw with Chelsea.
Pogba followed the last of those bright cameos by starting against RB Leipzig on the left of Ole Gunnar Solskjaer’s new-fangled midfield diamond and was instrumental in creating Mason Greenwood’s opening goal, driving at the opposition’s defence in a way that he cannot do when playing as part of a deep-lying double pivot in United’s usual 4-2-3-1.
Yet on the other occasions that Pogba has started this season, he has been woefully off-the-boil.
In the late and fortunate Premier League win away at Brighton he was anonymous, with just 41 touches of the ball and only 25 completed passes before being hooked off shortly after the hour mark. He was equally ineffective in the defeat to Crystal Palace a week earlier, while his performance in the 6-1 grew worse with every Tottenham goal.
There is one significant mitigating factor that must be considered in any assessment of Pogba’s start to the season, though.
While Pogba was on international duty with France in late August, Dider Deschamps announced that the midfielder had tested positive for Covid-19 and would observe a 14-day period of self-isolation.
Just over three weeks later, he was starting against Crystal Palace. He then started again against Brighton the following weekend, then played the full 90 minutes against Tottenham the weekend after that.
Pogba was subsequently dropped to the bench by Solskjaer, who suggested last week that he had made a mistake in rushing him back so soon. “Maybe I was unfair to him starting him that early in the first few games but he's coming on and he's done great when he's come on,” he admitted.
“He's been out for a while with coronavirus this summer, so he's getting better and better and maybe more in his shape,” the United manager added, hinting that Pogba is still working his way back to match fitness after the virus disrupted his pre-season preparations.
Pogba himself suggested that too on Sunday with his “out of breath” comment. In his MUTV interview, he talked about being the need to be “fresher” when sprinting from one penalty area to defend another and implied that he has to work on his fitness.
If that is the case and Pogba is still struggling with a short and disrupted pre-season, why start him twice in the space of four days against Leipzig and Arsenal?
Why keep him on the pitch for the full 90 minutes on Sunday when he looked fatigued and was becoming something of a liability?
Why, also, start him for three straight league games soon after his recovery, especially when his performances did not warrant it?
Pogba’s performances at the beginning of this season have left much to be desired but Solskjaer’s management of his most important player also deserves scrutiny in that regard.
It does not feel like a coincidence that Pogba’s best performances have either come off the bench or immediately after a prolonged run out of the starting line-up. Dropping him again, then slowly reintroducing him to regular football may be the solution for Solskjaer.
Rightly or wrongly, United’s record signing has spent much of his Old Trafford career under the glare of a spotlight but he currently looks like a player who, for now, needs to be taken out of it.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments