Manchester United news: Mino Raiola suggests Paul Pogba was subject to third-party ownership

The Italian-born agent also admitted that he had owned stakes in players before the practice of TPO was made illegal by Fifa in 2015

Samuel Lovett
Sunday 30 October 2016 15:52 GMT
Comments
Pogba joined United for a believed £89m though the exact figure remains unclear
Pogba joined United for a believed £89m though the exact figure remains unclear (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Mino Raiola has sparked fresh interest in the illegal practice of third-party ownership (TPO) after suggesting that Juventus were not the only owners of Paul Pogba’s rights during his time at the club.

The Italian-born agent also admitted that he had owned stakes in players before the practice of TPO was made illegal by Fifa in 2015.

This follows the recent controversy embroiling Sam Allardyce, in which the former England manager was caught telling undercover reporters that there are ways to circumvent existing TPO regulations.

Raiola made the revelations in a recent interview with the Financial Times.

“I can’t talk about the contract but, in a deal like Pogba’s, it’s not just the clubs who earn from it,” he said.

When asked if he was paid a fee by Juventus for Paul Pogba’s record-breaking transfer to Manchester United, he replied: “No — not in the way that you’re saying it.”

When asked to explain, the 48-year-old said: “I have to see how I can phrase this in a way that Juventus cannot tackle me through the law, let’s say. Hmm. How can I say it? [Long pause.] Yes: in this deal Juventus was not the only owner of the player’s rights.”

Juventus challenged the accusations, telling the FT: “No third party had any ownership of the player’s rights.”

The agent also revealed that he has previously owned stakes in players. “Not often. But sometimes.”

Faria: Mourinho sending off 'not important'

But Raiola refused to confirm whether Pogba was one of those players: “It’s not TPO. Be careful with the legal definition of TPO. But let’s say that in that case there was an upside for our side. And by our side, I mean the player’s side.”

Raiola oversaw Pogba’s world record move to United in the summer, from which it’s believed he made €27m.

He also represents Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Henrikh Mkhitaryan, both of whom joined United in the summer.

While it’s clear that neither Raiola, Pogba, Juventus or United have fallen guilty of foul play, the agent’s comments nonetheless place new focus on the now illegal practice.

The Independent has contacted Juventus for comment and is awaiting their response.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in