Pep Guardiola still has no answers for Man City’s wasteful finishing

Head coach is no closer to explaining his side’s failure to convert their dominance

Mark Critchley
Northern Football Correspondent
Wednesday 16 December 2020 08:57 GMT
Comments
(POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When was the last time that Manchester City took 26 shots or more at the Etihad in the league and failed to win?

You probably remember the day, even if it seems like a decade ago rather than merely August last year. It was City’s first home game last season and the back-to-back champions were hopeful of claiming their third consecutive Premier League title come May.

City were utterly dominant, battering a side managed by Mauricio Pochettino - remember him? - but somehow, they dropped their first points of the campaign in a 2-2 draw.

READ MORE: Pep Guardiola explains argument with fourth official

Erik Lamela and Lucas Moura scored with Tottenham’s only genuine attempts on goal and there was VAR controversy - quite a novel thing, at the time - as a potential Gabriel Jesus’ winner was ruled out.

Guardiola was at a loss when attempting to explain the result. “We played incredible,” he said. “One of the best games we’ve played in our time together. We played good, but unfortunately we could not win.”

Fast forward to the present day and some things have changed.

For one, back then, draws felt like defeats. City’s margin for error had been tiny the season before - so tiny, a 2-2 draw at home felt like losing ground in the title race, even if it was just one slip-up.

And in fact, yes, they had lost ground. Liverpool moved ahead of City that weekend and never relinquished their lead.

This season is different. City have drawn as many games as they have won - five apiece, plus two defeats - but they remain within reach of the early pace-setters and have a game in hand to play over most of their equally flawed rivals. They are still in the title race.

But while some things change, others stay the same and Guardiola is no closer to explaining why his players still have days like that day against Tottenham, when they dominate but drop points.

“I wanted to win and we couldn’t do it,” he said, glum and despondent after the 1-1 draw with West Bromwich Albion.

City had 26 shots on goal on Tuesday night, including two gilt-edged late opportunities for Ilkay Gundogan and Raheem Sterling, but could not get the better of man-of-the-match West Bromwich goalkeeper Sam Johnstone.

“We had chances but unfortunately we were not able to score goals, especially in the last three or four actions we had,” Guardiola added

He was asked several times, across various post-match interviews, to explain this wastefulness in front of goal and City’s wider attacking problems during their slow start to the season. His answers went around in circles.

What was missing? “Scoring a goal.” Why are City struggling to do that? “Because you have to shoot one ball inside the net.” Why have they found it easier in previous years? “Because we cannot score goals.”

Guardiola’s theories are more detailed than he is letting on and he simply isn’t willing to expand on them fully in public. Instead, he held a meeting with his squad this week to discuss where they can improve in attack, how they can create more chances and what they must do to become more clinical.

But whatever was said in those meetings, they did not produce immediate results.

In fairness to Guardiola, this is not an issue that affects every single City performance. In fact, his side had the most efficient shot conversion rate in the Premier League last season alongside Liverpool and - checks notes - Arsenal. The chances they created were among the best, too.

But isolated, freak bouts of poor finishing are still their undoing every now and again.

It wasn’t always this way. During their first title-winning campaign under Guardiola, City out-shot their opponents in an incredible 36 games and only dropped points in five of those matches. In Guardiola’s second title-winning year, they dominated 35 games and again, failed to win just five.

Then, last season, they out-shot their opponents in 34 games but dropped points in nine of them. This time around, they have out-shot their opponents in 10 games but have failed to win five of those matches.

City dominating the opposition but dropping points - just as they did in this draw with West Bromwich - has been an issue for more than a year now. If anything, is becoming a more regular occurrence.

It is a problem that began with that Tottenham game at the start of last season and one that Guardiola appears no closer to solving.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in