Louis van Gaal, not Manuel Pellegrini, is to blame for the Manchester malaise and a wasted season
INSIDE FOOTBALL
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Manchester derby should be the biggest game in the country but it is not even the biggest game on Sunday. Manchester United are the best-supported club in the country and Manchester City are the richest. They have won four of the last five Premier League titles between them. But this season both have dramatically underperformed: City are fourth and fading from the title race, United are sixth and out of it.
So how did we get here? How have these two sides been left so far behind by Leicester City and Tottenham Hotspur? The top people at the clubs are to blame, but not necessarily the people you might think.
The problem at Manchester United is simple and obvious: Louis van Gaal.
United have been badly managed for two years now, and that is why they are where they are, 16 points off the top, out of Europe, now just trying to hang on in the FA Cup and the race for fourth.
I know Ed Woodward, the United chief executive, has been blamed for signing the wrong players but I believe that blame is misplaced. The buys were not bad buys. The squad is not a bad squad. It is certainly not a squad that should be below Leicester, Tottenham and West Ham United in the table, 30 games in.
Yes, some of the signings have struggled, but whose fault is that?
Memphis Depay, Matteo Darmian and, to a lesser extent, Anthony Martial, started well before struggling. None of these players has improved under Van Gaal, which is damning. The problem is that they are not being used correctly.
If Martial plays up front, he needs support from wide areas, which he does not get. If he plays out wide, he needs Wayne Rooney inside him dropping deep to provide passes. If Depay plays out wide, he needs a full-back running outside him to give him more space. If Ander Herrera plays, he needs support to play box to box. But none of this is happening.
Instead, United’s players look inhibited by Van Gaal’s cautious approach, reluctant to express themselves or take risks.
United spend more time worrying about the opposition rather than letting the opposition worry about them, planning around the opposition’s strengths rather than their own. They have quick players but the football is so slow.
It is telling that David De Gea is set to be United’s player of the season again, having been man of the match in both legs of their Europa League defeat by Liverpool. He is a brilliant goalkeeper, of course, but the fact that he is United’s top performer shows that the rest of the team is not working properly.
That is why it is wrong to blame the players – they are only doing what the manager tells them. They know that if they don’t they will be dropped or sold.
Just look at Angel Di Maria – constrained by Van Gaal, absolutely sensational for Paris Saint-Germain. Or Javier Hernandez and Danny Welbeck, who are certainly doing well enough at their new clubs to have justified a place in this United team.
Van Gaal’s approach is wrong for this club and wrong for this league.
This is not romanticising “the Manchester United way” or anything like that. No one could expect them to play with two flying wingers and two strikers in 2016. There are not many natural wingers in the game any more.
What people want is a recognition that football has changed, that the game is becoming less about possession and more about counter-attacking.
That is the lesson of Leicester’s success, top of the league with less than 50 per cent possession in almost every game. Tottenham, too, are a counter-attacking team. But United sit still, playing pointless passes, allowing the opposition to get back into place before they consider going forward.
Yet they are still just four points behind Manchester City, who have their own problems. Given what they have spent, City are underachieving just as badly as United. And while their manager, Manuel Pellegrini, is paying with his job this summer, I do not believe it is his fault.
Pellegrini is not perfect and has made tactical mistakes in Europe. But his domestic record – one Premier League title, two League Cups – is good. I believe City’s struggles are not down to him, but to poor recruitment by the club.
Sporting director Txiki Begiristain has so much money to play with yet City are still desperately reliant on two world-class players, Vincent Kompany and Sergio Aguero. All teams have their stars, but the best sides must be able to cope without them. City cannot.
Their problem at centre-back is one of balance. All good centre-back partnerships are made of one ball-winner and one who sits back and reads the game. City have four centre-backs, but Kompany is the only one who can do both jobs. The other three all like to charge out to win the ball.
City had only just found some defensive balance, with Kompany and Nicolas Otamendi looking secure together. But now Kompany is injured again, City will see how much they rely on him.
None of their other centre-backs, all good players individually, can play together. Eliaquim Mangala cost £42m and Otamendi £30m but only one of them can play at any one time, which is just a lack of planning by the club.
But the fact that City will play two aggressive centre-backs, with attacking full-backs too, will give United some space to attack on Sunday. This is why it is not a day for Van Gaal football. United will need to get the ball forward in three passes, rather than six, to take advantage of the pace of Martial, Jesse Lingard and Marcus Rashford.
City have a similar problem up front as at centre-back. Aguero is another world-class player but City no longer have good alternatives or partners for him. They used to have strikers such as Edin Dzeko, Carlos Tevez and Alvaro Negredo to share the workload but this year, because of transfer market blundering, they are left with Wilfried Bony and Kelechi Iheanacho. When Aguero is out it is a long way down.
Bony is not a bad player, but he has not been a successful buy and is the opposite of what City need up front. Aguero likes to stretch the game, creating the space David Silva needs behind him. But Bony always comes short, dropping into Silva’s space, making it harder for him to create chances and goals.
Up front and in defence, City have bought badly, spending too much money on good players the team didn’t need. It is the opposite problem to United, who have bought the right players but used them in the wrong way.
That is why both sides are nowhere near where they should be, and why both are facing a summer of transition.
City have Pep Guardiola, the best manager in world football, coming in, and if they sign the right players – such as Thiago Alcantara from Bayern Munich – their future looks very bright.
United may need to follow suit, which is why Jose Mourinho is the right man to take over if Van Gaal does leave. They are at a moment now when the only thing that matters is results, and that is what Mourinho guarantees – although they must keep Ryan Giggs at the club so he can learn from Mourinho, as well as helping new signings to settle by telling them what it means to play for the club. Then, I hope, he can replace Mourinho when he goes.
Van Gaal was meant to bring substance over style but United have neither. Neither they nor City can afford another wasted season like this one.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments