Liverpool: Tom Hicks explains why George Gillett was to blame for Reds failure
The American has reflected on a disastrous period in charge at Anfield
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Former Liverpool owner Tom Hicks has blamed his former partner George Gillett for their collective failure to deliver success at Anfield.
The Americans took over the Reds in 2007 but sold three years later to John Henry and New England Sports Ventures group via a court ruling.
Hicks, now, has reflected on the mistakes he made and pins a lot of the blame on Gillett.
“Absolutely I made some mistakes. The biggest problem I had was I picked the wrong partner! I should’ve known better, I knew George Gillett from previous business deals that we’d ventured into together, where my firm owned 85 per cent and his 15 per cent, and he was impossible to deal with,” Hicks tells Sky Sports. “So why would I then go and do a fifty-fifty deal with the guy? Well shame on me!
“It was very frustrating because George had personal financial issues, he had other things going on, he just didn’t look at things the way I would have liked to have looked at things and so, in a 50-50 deal, you have to agree or you default to a negative position.
“For instance, I wanted to get rid of [chief executive] Rick Parry from the very beginning and George protected him for way too long and I think we lost a lot of momentum then, and yes, it was an interesting period of time!”
Hicks also concedes he attempted to oust Gillett from the club, though he could never quite pull it off, with his partner also trying to get rid of him at the same time.
“Yes, I knew it was a mistake after the first few months,” he adds. “We actually agreed to part ways but every time I tried to get the money to buy him out something would happen and he was also trying to do the same to me, it was just a very poor partnership.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments