Liverpool clubs snub stadium share plan

Wednesday 12 January 2005 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Liverpool and Everton will definitely not share a stadium, the local authority confirmed yesterday. The clubs had agreed to consider a proposal to share Liverpool's planned new £120m stadium, which is to be built very close to their present ground, Anfield, in Stanley Park, following pressure from the local authority and regeneration body, the North West Development Agency.

Liverpool and Everton will definitely not share a stadium, the local authority confirmed yesterday. The clubs had agreed to consider a proposal to share Liverpool's planned new £120m stadium, which is to be built very close to their present ground, Anfield, in Stanley Park, following pressure from the local authority and regeneration body, the North West Development Agency.

They met the Sports Minister, Richard Caborn, last month, although neither club displayed great enthusiasm for the idea.

A spokesman for Liverpool City Council said yesterday that both clubs had formally rejected the proposal. "It is disappointing both sides have been unable to reach agreement on a joint stadium," he said. "However, the existing plan for a new Anfield is part of a major regeneration of the Anfield-Breckfield area and we fully intend to help deliver that because of the economic benefits it will bring to an area that badly needs them.

"Of course, we will also do everything we can to help Everton find a 21st-century solution for the club and its fans."

Peter Kilfoyle, the Liverpool Walton MP who helped to broker talks between the clubs and Caborn, said: "It is not really surprising. There was never much enthusiasm for the idea. Liverpool was well down the track with its own plans and Everton was struggling to raise the money needed."

The Liverpool chief executive, Rick Parry, now wants to focus on the club's own plans for a new stadium. He said: "The joint stadium proposal has been thoroughly examined over an extended period of time and has now been rejected.

"But as we have consistently pointed out, this is much more than just a new ground for Liverpool Football Club.

"It has always been about the regeneration of north Liverpool and the benefits it will bring to a local community that desperately needs them.

"With the issue now finally resolved, we hope that all parties involved can pull together to get this project delivered as quickly as possible."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in