Eriksson familiar with financial roller coaster at top
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When Roman Abramovich's estimated £9.5bn fortune has just failed to deliver the Carling Cup, there must be uncertainties about the capacity of Thaksin Shinawatra (estimated personal wealth with assets unfrozen: £1.5bn) to turn Manchester City into the "next Manchester United".
But the club's manager, Sven Goran Eriksson, declared himself ready to go along for the ride yesterday, even though his analysis of the chairman's notion was laced with demonstrably more realism.
Did Thaksin have a full understanding of what it takes to compete with the Uniteds of this world, Eriksson was asked.
"I'm quite sure he knows how much the other clubs are paying for star players," Eriksson replied. "Remember that Chelsea was a good team but only started to compete with Manchester United and Arsenal when Abramovich came in. How long it will take I don't know.
"It depends on a lot of things – how good the players we have now are and how much better they can become – and depends on the level of players we take in the future because they must be the very top if we are to do that.
"Beating United in a single match, of course, is positive, but beating them over the course of a season or on an international level, given their fame, will be really difficult. That's why United are where they are and why we are where we are," Eriksson added.
Of course, City are not the only second-string club with money to invest in being "the next Manchester United", which means clubs may have no interest in taking your buckets of Thai cash. Take Tottenham, Eriksson suggested.
"Of course they want to keep [Dimitar] Berbatov. I wouldn't say it [would be] suicide, but it would be very close if they let him go. They don't want to be 11th in the table next season at this stage."
Eriksson knows that money can be ephemeral in football. At Lazio, he fought for the title for three years and finally won it, plus the European Cup-Winners' Cup, with money behind him. But then it ran out.
"That is why Lazio are where they are today," he said. He will also be aware that his chairman, whose decision to take Kaspar Schmeichel and Kelvin Etuhu to Bangkok will be viewed by many as a publicity stunt, cherishes media attention and has a track record when it comes to issuing sound bites like yesterday's.
An interview Thaksin gave in December may be nearer reality. In it, he complained that running a football club was painfully expensive and that he might need to seek securitisation of the gate receipts to obtain loan funding for investment in the club – a fateful path which Leeds followed – to help move City on.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments