Liverpool's Daniel Sturridge seeking more time to respond to FA betting charge

The striker was charged by the FA last week in relation to betting during January 2018

Mark Critchley
Tuesday 20 November 2018 23:35 GMT
Comments
Jurgen Klopp says Daniel Sturridge is in 'the best shape since I've known him' after Liverpool's PSG win

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Daniel Sturridge has asked for more time to respond to his Football Association misconduct charge in relation to an alleged breach of betting rules.

The Liverpool striker was charged by the FA last week in relation to betting during January 2018, at the time of his loan move to West Bromwich Albion.

Sturridge was handed an initial deadline of 6.00pm on Tuesday evening to submit a formal response to the charge.

However, it is understood that Sturridge’s representatives have asked to be granted more time by the case’s independent judicial panel.

The independent panel’s chair will make a decision on whether to accept Sturridge’s request in the coming days.

Sturridge denied ever gambling on football upon the announcement of the charge last Monday.

However, the regulations in question also prohibit players from passing on privileged information to others.

“Daniel has given his full and unequivocal cooperation throughout this process and has assured the club he will continue to do so,” a Liverpool statement, released last Monday, read.

“Daniel has also stated categorically that he has never gambled on football. As with any issue of this nature, we will allow the process to be concluded in its entirety before making any further comment.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in