Chelsea ridiculed over design of new 60,000-seat Stamford Bridge that looks like 'Friar Tuck's hair' and a 'mushroom'

The proposed design for Chelsea's new home wasn't very well received by rival fans

Tom Sheen
Wednesday 02 December 2015 09:54 GMT
Comments
(Chelsea FC)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

On Tuesday Chelsea revealed full plans for their redeveloped 60,000-seat Stamford Bridge.

The new stadium, which will sit on the same site as their current ground, still needs planning permission but if approved it'll cost owner Roman Abramovich around £600million to complete, with the club anticipating their first match at the ground in August 2020.

However, rival fans haven't been so impressed with the plans, designed by Swiss architecture firm Herzog and de Meuron, who were famously behind Bayern Munich's Allianz Arena and the Beijing National Stadium - dubbed the Bird's Nest.

The new Stamford Bridge will apparently draw inspiration from Westminster Abbey, but naysayers have been rather more brutal, stating it looks more like a prison, an egg slicer or a portabello mushroom.

Here is some of the best reaction to the plans:

We rather like it. Better than a round concrete bowl at any rate.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in