David Wagner accuses Charlie Austin of deliberately kicking Huddersfield's Jonas Lossl in the face
Austin collided with Lossl during the first half when chasing a loose ball, requiring Lossl to get lengthy treatment
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
David Wagner accused Charlie Austin of intentionally kicking Jonas Lossl in the face during Saturday’s 1-1 draw at St Mary’s.
Austin collided with Lossl during the first half when chasing a loose ball, requiring Lossl to get lengthy treatment and sparking an angry reaction from Huddersfield players and fans. Austin was not punished by referee Lee Probert, although the Football Association could still examine it tomorrow, and Wagner explained afterwards how unhappy he was with Austin.
“It was a very ugly, nasty challenge, this should never happen,” Wagner said. “There was so much distance from the goalkeeper and the ball, Jonas was so early on the ball. This should never happen. Unfortunately Charlie Austin made the wrong decision at the moment, and this happened.”
Wagner said that, having reviewed the video footage, he believed that Austin kicked Lossl in the face intentionally. “I have seen the video footage, and this should usually never happen,” he said. “The opponent hurts an opponent on purpose, even if I don’t like to say that, but it looks like it.”
Southampton manager Mauricio Pellegrino disputed Wagner’s interpretation. “I don’t think that Charlie goes with bad intention in this moment,” he said. “It is part of football, football is a sport with a lot of contacts. I respect everybody’s opinion, but I did not observe bad intention.”
Regardless of whether Austin is banned, Pellegrino confirmed that the striker is likely to be out for “a couple of weeks minimum” with a hamstring injury he sustained in the second half, effectively rendering the prospect of a three-game ban irrelevant.
Pellegrino left Virgil van Dijk out of his matchday squad today, with the Dutch centre-back still linked with January moves to Liverpool or Manchester City. He confirmed afterwards that Van Dijk was not injured and that he made his decision for football reasons.
“I decided this was the best for this moment,” he said. “I am responsible to pick 11 players.” When asked if this was connected to transfer speculation, Pellegrino did not deny it. “There is a lot of speculation, we have to wait for what happens. I choose these players to play the best today.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments