Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The fans' view: Fans split over move but it will mean end of the 'homely' West Ham we love

More income and better players or empty seats and loss of 'home'?

Graeme Howlett
Wednesday 05 December 2012 23:25 GMT
Comments
The future of the Olympic Stadium is still undecided
The future of the Olympic Stadium is still undecided (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Today was momentous in the history of West Ham United. The prospect of moving to the Olympic Stadium could potentially allow this famous old club to rub shoulders with the giants of the English, and European, game.

Yet that possibility is anathema to some supporters who remain vehemently opposed to uprooting from the Boleyn Ground, our home for 107 years.

The most recent poll on the supporters' website KUMB.com, conducted shortly after the 2012 Olympics, showed 64 per cent in favour of moving. However, the previous poll conducted eight months earlier saw 61 per cent of fans vote against the move.

Those against argue that the Boleyn Ground is sufficient for a club of West Ham's stature. Where will the additional fans come from to regularly fill 60,000 seats?

Others are suspicious of the co-owners; is this simply just one final pay-day for David Gold and his business partner David Sullivan? Why would they sell a ground the club owns to take a tenancy elsewhere? And why have the supporters never been fully consulted about the move?

Yet those in favour of moving argue that the fantastic transport links mean fans from western Europe will only be a few hours away. And that more seats could mean cheaper tickets, enticing back supporters for whom Premier League football is simply too expensive presently.

Also, the prestige of playing in a world-famous venue in the globe's best-marketed league would attract some of the world's best players – paid from more lucrative sponsorship and marketing deals. Retractable seating will bring fans as close to the pitch as they are at the Boleyn. It's a no-brainer.

Whatever form the move to Stratford will take, it will certainly mean the end of "homely" West Ham United we know. All supporters can do is place their trust in the current owners to deliver their own legacy worthy of this great club.

Graeme Howlett is editor of West Ham fans' website Knees up Mother Brown: kumb.com

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in