Race report could help to change attitudes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Campaigners are hoping that a new report, which labels football as "institutionally racist", will serve as a catalyst for change within the game.
The report, compiled by the Independent Football Commission, is not published until next week but some of its findings have already been revealed in a leak. The IFC want the Football Association, Football League and Premier League to "co-opt" more staff and board members from ethnic minorities.
The Government-backed report also calls for more work to improve the racial mix of those involved in playing, coaching and watching the game in the next three years - thereby avoiding the need for a Whitehall-appointed football "Czar".
However, it is the finding that the game is being perceived as "institutionally racist" - under the criterion used by Sir William Macpherson about the Metropolitan Police in the 1999 Stephen Lawrence inquiry - which has inevitably raised most concern.
Piara Powar, director of the anti-racism Kick It Out campaign, who has read the report, revealed that he "accepted and understood" the use of the phrase. "However, it has become so loaded that it can provoke defensive responses. We talk in terms of exclusions and a lack of adequate representation," he said. "Our view is that there is an issue of exclusion within the game, whether it relates to the representation of ethnic minorities among players, supporters or coaches, as well as the governing bodies.
"We're hoping that this report can provide a positive springboard for further change, especially where change is not already on the agenda."
Powar believes that the responsibility for these changes must be shared between the governing bodies, as well as the clubs. "The FA have their ethics and equity policy, which is the right way forward. But it is the way in which this is implemented upon which they will be judged," he added.
"The FA have to make sure they are doing everything they can about these issues so that they are providing good leadership and then we need to develop practical solutions."
The report is not entirely negative, highlighting the good work being done not only by the Kick It Out campaign but also by individual clubs, such as Southend, Oldham and Rotherham. Powar said: "The report also acknowledges that some important changes have taken place.
"Some clubs are doing very good work. While Leeds and Leicester are mentioned in the report, there is also great work being done at other clubs, like Charlton, Blackburn and Manchester United."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments