‘It’s like someone offering you a million pounds but shooting you after’: Tranmere co-owner hits out at Project Big Picture
EFL stands to gain a £250m emergency rescue package and 25% share of the Premier League’s revenue, but would give up control of the English game to the elite clubs in return
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Project Big Picture proposals have been likened to "someone offering you a million pounds but shooting you soon after" by Tranmere co-owner Nicola Palios.
EFL chairman Rick Parry is working on the revolutionary proposals with the support of Liverpool and Manchester United.
They include an immediate £250m rescue package for EFL clubs starved of matchday income by the coronavirus pandemic and the promise of a 25 per cent cut of future Premier League media revenues.
But it also conveys a greater say over the game's governance to the Premier League's big six, something Palios is deeply concerned about.
"There are some clear good elements to Project Big Picture but they are hugely outweighed by the downsides that will destroy the game in this country," she wrote on Twitter.
"Once you've given all the power to a small group they can do what they want.
"B teams would be with us in a heartbeat. The EFL would get 25 per cent of the TV money but only after the best of all the games are taken away from TV to be streamed by the big clubs. And what's to stop them changing the distribution methodology in future, to say 10 per cent?
"We must not be blinded by the short-term offer of a cash lifeline. It's like someone offering you a million pounds but shooting you soon after."
Parry said on BBC Radio Four's Today programme on Monday morning that the 25 per cent share of revenues would be "in perpetuity" but it is understood those behind PBP accept there are no such guarantees.
It is understood Parry will hold meetings with the 72 EFL clubs on Tuesday to discuss PBP.
Bolton chairman Sharon Brittan spoke more positively about the plans in a statement on her club's website, describing them as a useful "first step".
"We are fully in favour of steps which can be taken to address the inequitable distribution of finances between the Premier League and EFL," Brittan wrote.
"The summary details of Project Big Picture appear to go some way to help drive sustainability for the EFL's member clubs and this can only be a good thing for clubs' long-term growth and the communities in which they are based.
"Bolton Wanderers' recent history shows how important a football club is to the local community and that the model of football clubs relying solely on owner funding is broken.
"This town came very close to losing its club and the board believes that radical change has long been required to create a football pyramid which allows clubs at the lower levels to be sustainable yet be competitive on the field.
"We hope that conversations around Project Big Picture are the first step on this path."
Former Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger believes there is a need for a long-term solution.
"If nothing happens, the smaller clubs will die. I don't think that one payment will sort out the problem. The problem is much deeper than that," Wenger said at a Sky event on Monday.
"The money certainly has to be shared, the income of the top clubs has to be shared a fraction more with the smaller clubs."
Downing Street has condemned the "backroom dealing" behind PBP, while the Premier League says it will have a "damaging impact" on the game, and affect the strength of the competition.
It has been reported that the Football Association would use its 'golden share' in the Premier League to veto the proposed plan if it came forward.
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments