Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Peter Herbert: Chelsea did the right thing reporting the referee

 

Peter Herbert
Sunday 04 November 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments
Lawyer Peter Herbert thinks Chelsea did the right thing
Lawyer Peter Herbert thinks Chelsea did the right thing

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I think it is rather sad in this day and age that you put in a complaint about an alleged hate-crime and just because it happens to be a referee and happens to be football, people are saying it cannot happen. People said the same about John Terry and Luis Suarez.

They don't seem to understand that what happens in football is part of society, and if football will not put its house in order – which it clearly has not – then lawyers and activists have every right to have these matters investigated properly. Let us be clear that we are not siding with any club, individual or group and not passing comment on the likelihood of what Mark Clattenburg may or may not have done.We didn't make the accusation, but the comments on Friday by Arsène Wenger, Sir Alex Ferguson and others show that football is quite happy to sweep the issue under the carpet.

It is also ill-advised when there is a criminal investigation to seek to pass judgement on a person you don't know. A first-year law student would tell you that. It is surprising that, with all the resources they have available, these managers do not think before they speak and get some legal advice themselves. They will look very stupid if something is proven at the end of the day, and their comments are irrelevant and wholly unprofessional.

At the end of the day managers become part of the problem, with a culture of burying heads in the sand, saying this can never happen and failing to see the impact it has on wider society.

Football has not addressed racism properly and not penalised it properly. The punishment for Terry and Suarez was derisory, and if you were employed elsewhere you would be lucky not to be sacked for gross misconduct. The FA need to have at least a six- or 12-month ban for any act of racial abuse. Otherwise, it means that to be racist in football is perfectly affordable. The bottom line is that football has to learn some hard lessons.

Peter Herbert is from the society of black lawyers

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in