Peter Corrigan: Mutu point about justice
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.As a source of sound sense and judgement, the Football Association were falling well short of satisfaction even before the headless-chicken mode they entered with the loss of their chief executive, Mark Palios, but I feel their treatment of Adrian Mutu was just about right.
The 25-year-old Romanian, who admitted taking cocaine, was suspended for seven months, fined £20,000 and ordered to take a rehabilitation course, after which he will face regular tests.
Considering that the drug was not performance-enhancing, that he confessed frankly and shows all the signs of a sinner capable of repentance, this was a just decision. Had it been more harsh than the eight-month ban Rio Ferdinand received for avoiding a test, it would have signalled that tests are worth missing.
Chelsea's reaction was astonishing. Their chief executive, Peter Kenyon, slammed the FA for their lenience in not giving him a two-year suspension, and threatened to sue the player for compensation. Not content with disowning the player and sacking him, they want to pursue him to the gates of hell. I can't recall anything more despicable, and I wonder if their indignation has a deeper root.
For a start, if I was owner Roman Abramovich, I would want to know who sanctioned the transfer fee of £16m on a "cokehead". Chelsea were flinging money about so wildly that they obviously didn't spend much time checking the backgrounds of their purchases.
And is their claim for compensation anything to so with wanting to see Mutu portrayed in the worst possible light? The prospect that Mutu could be playing for a rival next May can't be too pleasant for them, either. Nevertheless, I find the thought of him banging a few in against them next season very comforting.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments