Olof Lundh: Manuel Pellegrini's cheap shot at Swedish referees after Manchester City defeat is unfair
Jonas Eriksson’s decision to send off Demichelis changed the game but it was the correct call
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sweden’s referees have been involved in several high-profile incidents over the past few years. First you had Anders Frisk, who retired after being issued with death threats by some Chelsea fans after a Champions League tie against Barcelona in 2005.
Then there was Martin Hansson. He was the referee for Ireland’s World Cup play-off against France in 2009 when Thierry Henry’s handball set up the winning goal. He ended up going to the World Cup in South Africa but was not put in charge of a single game.
Sometimes the referee can make a mistake, but in the case of Jonas Eriksson’s decision to send off Manchester City’s Martin Demichelis I don’t think he got anything wrong. It’s not as if City were playing Rochdale and lost to a controversial penalty – they were up against the mighty Barcelona, who won fair and square.
Most people in Sweden think Manuel Pellegrini’s decision to go after us is ridiculous and we have been singled out unfairly. Eriksson is considered one of the best referees in the world and Fifa’s Jim Boyce has already defended him. If Pellegrini was being fair on his team then he would see they lacked a bit of edge. Everyone can understand his disappointment but it’s a very cheap shot.
Two years ago, referees in Sweden decided they would meet the press 20 minutes after each game to explain their decisions because they felt they had more to win by doing that than they had to lose. The experiment has been very beneficial for supporters and referees themselves. It gives them an opportunity to show they are human beings. That’s different from Fifa and Uefa, who lock them away and they can’t say anything. Eriksson is a media man and he will be frustrated that he can’t tell his version of events.
Olof Lundh is a Swedish journalist for TV4–sport
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments