FA bewildered by Sutcliffe's funding threat
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Football Association is bemused at a bizarre and heavy-handed attack on it by sports minister Gerry Sutcliffe whose threats to withdraw £25m of government funding would have a profound effect on grassroots football.
The Labour minister chose the party political season to attack the FA for not implementing changes recommended by Lord Burns' review and failing to mend its difficult relationship with the Premier League and the Football League. Claiming the FA is still dominated by the blazer brigade – or "the old school" as Sutcliffe described them – is a failsafe option for any politician looking for an easy tap-in.
Curiously, Sutcliffe made no mention of the fact that it is the government whose funding of the Football Foundation is £25m short on targets set in 2003. They are equal partners in that charitable foundation, along with the FA and the Premier League.
There is no doubt that the FA has a dysfunctional relationship with the two leagues but with five representatives of the Premier League and Football League on its newly-configured board they are at least inclusive. Many of the Burns reforms have been implemented, especially with the appointment of Lord Triesman, the organisation's first independent chairman.
Lord Burns' proposals, which were announced in 2005, were never likely to be implemented overnight but many of them have been brought in since. Sutcliffe said that withholding funding could be a "lever" for government to make the FA change but that would involve rewriting legal criteria that the FA has met.
The notion that the FA is still run by football's equivalent of what Sutcliffe said was "rugby's old farts" shows a poor understanding. The county, Armed Forces and Oxbridge representatives still have a place on the FA council but their influence on the big decisions made by Lord Triesman and chief executive Ian Watmore is non-existent.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments