Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Michael Garcia quits Fifa ethics investigator role following row over World Cup report with scathing statement

The American was angered by how his report into the bids for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups were summarised

Tom Peck
Wednesday 17 December 2014 17:35 GMT
Comments
Sepp Blatter announces Qatar as the successful bidders for the 2022 World Cup last year
Sepp Blatter announces Qatar as the successful bidders for the 2022 World Cup last year (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Fifa is facing the most serious crisis in its embattled history, after their own investigator into corruption in the 2018 and 2022 World Cup bidding process resigned, launching a scathing attack on football’s governing body, all but accusing Fifa of a deliberate cover up.

US Attorney Michael Garcia’s timing is spectacular. It was he who was commissioned by Fifa to conduct an extensive investigation into allegations of corruption in the bidding process for the two tournaments.

Fifa’s Executive Committee are gathering in Morocco for the Club World Cup where they are expected to vote on whether Mr Garcia’s report should be published. They were expected to vote ‘no’, but now they will vote against the backdrop of the most extreme allegations. Namely, that the summary of his report published by Fifa contains “edits, omissions, and additions” that cannot be justified, and that he has “lost confidence in the independence of the Adjudicatory Chamber.” In other words, that there are darker machinations at work.

Michel Platini, the former French footballer who is head of Uefa, Fifa’s European arm, was told of the development by journalists in the gardens of the La Mamounia hotel in Marrakech, where Fifa’s executives are staying. He called it, “A new failure for Fifa.”

“We wanted transparency,” he said.

All that has currently been made public is a short summary of his report by German judge Hans Joachim Eckert, which Garcia claimed within hours of its publication was “erroneous” and contained “misrepresentations.”

Michael Garcia
Michael Garcia (Getty Images)

His appeal against Eckert’s report was rejected by Fifa on Tuesday, and just over 24 hours later, he resigned. “No principled approach could justify the Eckert Decision's edits, omissions, and additions,” he said.

Judge Eckert is a longstanding German judge with an impeccable reputation, at least until joining Fifa. He is the head of its Adjudicatory Chamber.

“No independent governance committee, investigator, or arbitration panel can change the culture of an organization,” Garcia said. “And while the Eckert Decision made me lose confidence in the independence of the Adjudicatory Chamber, it is the lack of leadership on these issues within FIFA that leads me to conclude that my role in this process is at an end.”

The resignation marks yet another new low for Fifa, and the accusation that Judge Eckert’s summary was not done independently is a very serious one. It will take a quite extraordinary volte face from Fifa to now make Garcia’s report public. But for as long as they do not do so, they remain open to the accusation made by Mr Garcia, that the summary of his report was deliberately misleading, and that when Judge Eckert produced it, he was not acting independently.

Fifa President Sepp Blatter has already declared he believes the bidding process to be “at an end”, and any likelihood of Qatar or Russia being stripped of their tournaments were already slim and now even slimmer.

Mr Garcia said in his statement that he would not be taking the matter to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. “It now appears that, at least for the foreseeable future, the Eckert Decision will stand as the final word on the 2018/2022 FIFA World Cup bidding process,” he said.

Garcia’s resignation will now hang over Fifa’s meeting tomorrow, increasing the pressure to publish the report. But both Judge Eckert and President Blatter have said in public statements that it would be legally impossible to publish the report, even in redacted form.

Mr Garcia could leak it, but the implications for a practising US Attorney in doing such a thing are serious. When he agreed to write the report, several years ago, it was made clear to him that the report would not become public, as it would risk the confidentiality of those who cooperated with him.

Fifa’s President Blatter, when pressed on the matter at the Club World Cup semi-final at the Stade de Marrakech, said: “Listen we’ve just received this information. I can’t comment on it. I will do it tomorrow at the Committee.”

Later, he said in a statement from Fifa: “ “I am surprised by Mr Garcia’s decision. The work of the Ethics Committee will nonetheless continue and will be a central part of the discussions at the ExCo meeting in the next two days.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in