Former Lincoln City defender Bradley Wood given six-year ban for match-fixing during historic FA Cup run
The 26-year-old deliberately got himself booked twice during Lincoln’s run to the FA Cup quarter-finals last season, with bookmakers spotting irregular bets on the market
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Former Lincoln City defender Bradley Wood has received a six-year ban for match-fixing after getting himself intentionally booked twice during the non-league club’s FA Cup run last season.
Wood, 26, was found guilty of two match-fixing offences by the Football Association after informing friends to bet on him to receive a yellow card in the victories over Ipswich Town and Burnley. The FA revealed that seven people, including two of Wood’s close friends, wagered money on him to receive a booking, with potential winnings of around £10,000.
However, not all of the bets were paid out.
Wood contested the two charges but admitted 23 other breaches of the FA’s Integrity and Betting Rules. He was found to have committed 25 betting-related breaches, and has been banned until 8 March, 2024. He was also fined £3,725 and ordered to pay costs of £1,550.
Two people known to Wood placed bets on both matches that gambling firms noticed were "atypical in the context of the caution betting market", according to the FA's written judgement.
"The gravamen of the case against Mr Wood is that he planned to be cautioned, told personal acquaintances of that plan so that they and others to whom the information was passed placed bets," read the FA's written judgement.
"The data supplied by betting organisations has revealed what is said to be unusual bets being placed on Mr Wood being cautioned in both matches. Two of those placing the bets are said to have close personal involvement with Mr Wood.
"It is said that the bets were atypical in the context of the caution betting market, and in relation to the betting history of those placing the bets. The potential winnings (some were not paid) totalled approximately £10,000."
The FA's written judgement concluded Wood "influenced a football betting market by intentionally seeking to be cautioned by the match referee".
Lincoln have revealed they were informed about the investigation in April 2017, then suspending Wood for the final two weeks of his contract and releasing him in May.
Chief executive Liam Scully admitted Lincoln were stunned by the initial allegations.
"This football club takes its own integrity, and the integrity of football as whole, extremely seriously so were shocked and saddened to be informed of the allegations," said Scully, in a statement issued by Lincoln.
"We acted quickly when we were first informed and have, at the request of the FA and for the sake of Bradley Wood, kept the allegations private until the matter was resolved.
"We wholeheartedly condemn any behaviour which could tarnish the reputation of football as a sport and have given the FA our complete support in conducting the investigation.
"It is important to note, however, that these charges relate to the individual actions of a single player and it is accepted by everyone that they played no part in the results of games.
"We are relieved the matter has now been brought to a conclusion."
Additional reporting by PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments